WebM: The video codec of HTML 5

WebM comprises a container based on Matroska and the VP8 video codec developed by On2 and acquired by Google. For audio, the free Vorbis codec is used.

This project was developed by Google (which brings VP8), Mozilla and Opera and the main actors of the Web rallied to this format, that could become the codec of the HTML 5 <video> tag.
Adobe has announced a support in the Flash player.
Microsoft will support WebM next to H.264 in Internet Explorer 9 if the user adds the codec itself.

Manufacturers of graphics processing units (for computer, cameras) will implement the codec: AMD for processors and graphics units, ARM for processors for mobile, Nvidia for GPUs, Intel will includes support to WebM to its chips if the format become popular, Texas Instruments for processors, and many others ...

WebM is on Youtube

The leading provider of video in the world has already started to put online videos in the VP8 format. It is possible to see them through a search on the site with an additional parameter: 

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=trailers&aq=f&webm=1

Obviously you need a compatible browser.

The question of patents

The most common codec, H.264, which is considered better than the open source theora codec is the subject of patents holds by the MPEG/LA which charges very high annual fees for streaming videos in this format.

Note that software patents that restrict utilisation of such codecs are valid only in the U.S. and South Korea.
However it is enough to prohibit the adoption of H.264 by Firefox even if an independent project was launched to a version of Firefox supporting it for the rest of the world.
With the arrival of WebM which is freely licensed, of quality close to § H.264, browsers have a free codec to implement for the <video> tag

On May 4, 2010, the license has been redefined to separate the copyright on the code that is now under the BSD license, and the patent on the codec that keeps a clause against litigations. This clause prohibits its use for who is suing it for patent infringement.

VP8 is it a copy of H.264?

When Steve Jobs was asked about what are the plans of Apple with respect to WebM, he just put a link in response to this Technical analysis of VP8.
Go to "Addendum C: Summary for the lazy" for a summary.
Is VP8 better than H.264? This comparison was made by a programmer of H.264. Is it objective? An answer.

Actually there are some contradictions in the analysis:

That’s right: this software is even older than x264!

and then:

In short, it seems to have been released too early.

finally:

VP8 is simply way too similar to H.264.

So, the codec is older than H.264, was released too early and finally it is a copy of H.264!

Another comparison.

More


©2010 Scriptol.com